Local Government Pension Schemes should not be afraid of investing more of their assets in their local areas, according to a new report. The study, by Sheffield Political Economy Research unit, said that funds need to overcome their traditional reluctance to do so due to the “double exposure” risk in which a local economic downturn might also be reflected in lower returns on investments.
However, it said that the financial crisis had exposed the dangers of investing in London-centred capital markets.
It said: “The regulations, such as valuation cycles, that encourage pension funds to over-invest in so-called conventional assets should be reviewed, since the crisis proves that such assets are not as reliable as we might normally assume.”
It added that, although it was unwise for a single pension fund to be exposed to a single, or small number of local economies, “it is nevertheless not unreasonable to expect an even distribution of pension fund capital by geography”.
Most read in
- IFRS 9 override extended to 2029 for existing investments(47 views)
- After EFS: Worcestershire s151 Phil Rook on the uncertain road to financial resilience(33 views)
- Richard Harbord: section 114 was never meant for today’s crisis(31 views)
- Yes Minister: Treasury ‘confident’ LGPS pool’s FCA authorisations can be achieved by March 2026(23 views)
- New: LGPS regional investment special report(21 views)
- Westminster borrows £235m over 42 years to acquire temporary accommodation – an ‘innovative’ solution or should government do more?(19 views)
- The rise of the senior LGPS officer: how will the new role impact funds?(17 views)
- ‘Golden opportunity to turn ship around’ must not be squandered in Spending Review, say London boroughs(17 views)
- Room151 LGPS podcast: investing in venture capital climate solutions(16 views)
- The government’s push to merge pools lacks transparency(15 views)
More from
Scaling up efficiencies could be key to successful AI adoption in local government
The adoption of artificial intelligence in local government could be just as much about maximising available resources – essentially doing more with less – as it is about making immediate financial savings or efficiencies.